Court Rivals Forums

CHICKEN · 2011-03-02 00:25:31

Anybody see something wierd going on with last few rounds ?

It seems "Ten Players" have found some sort of "TURBO" & charged up their team somewhat

from this (game28) ;
http://www.courtrivals.com/showBoxscore.php?gid=956875

To this (Game 29) ;
http://www.courtrivals.com/showBoxscore.php?gid=958370

& This (Game 30) ;
http://www.courtrivals.com/showBoxscore.php?gid=959867

All games feature "Pro-A" teams

Seems a little odd to me

Last edited by CHICKEN (2011-03-02 00:26:14)

cokemachine · 2011-03-02 00:28:05

I thought that too but between Its All About and your team. We won by 50ish first too times then you beat us by like 5 or something. I thought that was weird.

cokemachine · 2011-03-02 00:29:32

Not calling you a cheater though. Sim seems messed up.

Urbanstien · 2011-03-02 00:29:59

I think maybe he just put all his SP in. maybe didn't have them all season. but he is a memeber of the Pats. And they have been rumored for seasons to be a MOD/ game owner team .

CHICKEN · 2011-03-02 00:37:47

cokemachine wrote:
I thought that too but between Its All About and your team. We won by 50ish first too times then you beat us by like 5 or something. I thought that was weird

Not calling you a cheater though. Sim seems messed up.

The reason for the big change in scores (50 'ish) between "It's All About" & "City West Morgue" .... is because All players in my team (CWM) recieved a Skill Pt & Next level CHEM

& The change in "Ten Players" seems much more of a jump.

CHICKEN · 2011-03-02 00:41:29

Urbanstien wrote:
I think maybe he just put all his SP in. maybe didn't have them all season. but he is a memeber of the Pats. And they have been rumored for seasons to be a MOD/ game owner team .

that was my first guess, ... but the pattern of their "Wins" & "Losses" doesn't really fit that & coupled with the winning margins, ... I thought their maybe something amiss with the SIM, .... "Play-by-Play" view of the games does not suggest any "foul play"

cokemachine · 2011-03-02 00:54:31

CHICKEN wrote:
cokemachine wrote:
I thought that too but between Its All About and your team. We won by 50ish first too times then you beat us by like 5 or something. I thought that was weird

Not calling you a cheater though. Sim seems messed up.
The reason for the big change in scores (50 'ish) between "It's All About" & "City West Morgue" .... is because All players in my team (CWM) recieved a Skill Pt & Next level CHEM

& The change in "Ten Players" seems much more of a jump.

I new something like that happened. You are right theres is much more of a gap

bheilman · 2011-03-02 01:20:30

To be honest, I did just start paying attention to the team last week. I had started training one attribute the first day, then a second attribute on like day 10 until that time.

I am not doing anything modish or illegal but I do have a different strategy that I am using. I will be more than happy to divulge it in a few weeks as it seems to be pretty dominant so far.

CHICKEN · 2011-03-02 01:31:06

bheilman wrote:
To be honest, I did just start paying attention to the team last week. I had started training one attribute the first day, then a second attribute on like day 10 until that time.

I am not doing anything modish or illegal but I do have a different strategy that I am using. I will be more than happy to divulge it in a few weeks as it seems to be pretty dominant so far.

Like I said, ... I didn't think there was any outside intervention, ... & your right .... it does seem to be a "dominant" tactic

Urbanstien · 2011-03-02 02:02:01

bheilman wrote:
To be honest, I did just start paying attention to the team last week. I had started training one attribute the first day, then a second attribute on like day 10 until that time.

I am not doing anything modish or illegal but I do have a different strategy that I am using. I will be more than happy to divulge it in a few weeks as it seems to be pretty dominant so far.

Yeah just messing with ya.

Hubbalicious · 2011-03-02 07:12:09

well there is only like 5 active teams in west this season. LOL

CHICKEN · 2011-03-02 07:54:07

Hubbalicious wrote:
well there is only like 5 active teams in west this season. LOL

There is probably 10 active teams, ... & the 2 teams that were "Blown Away" are Active Teams, ..... hence my query ... lol

bheilman · 2011-03-02 13:22:51

yeah i didnt take it personally guys, i am still not sure if those games were flukes or if this strategy is that crazy good. Kaz might have to start paying more attention to the rules he puts into West league each season. Cuz I might have "solved" this ruleset.

rhekz · 2011-03-02 18:41:40

and we are among the active ones. Refer to Season 20 & 21 West. Our captain eh?

connbound · 2011-03-02 20:52:44

Yeah, my team was the first one that got pounded by the strategy, honestly after seeing the score from the night before I didn't put any thought into the game at all, then looked in and was shocked. Somehow your strategy caused my guys to miss pretty much all their shots, as if they were 264 point players, was very strange to watch. I thought about posting, but honestly really don't care all that much. I am ratting my main player in classic, and am pretty much just running Old West for something to do this season.

CHICKEN · 2011-03-02 21:30:27

connbound wrote:
Yeah, my team was the first one that got pounded by the strategy, honestly after seeing the score from the night before I didn't put any thought into the game at all, then looked in and was shocked. Somehow your strategy caused my guys to miss pretty much all their shots, as if they were 264 point players, was very strange to watch. I thought about posting, but honestly really don't care all that much. I am ratting my main player in classic, and am pretty much just running Old West for something to do this season.

Yeah, .... I'm pretty much in the same boat, ..... just running a team in WEST to keep numbers up.
My team is getting the same treatment right now ..... whatever the strategy is, .... it's working big time !

bheilman · 2011-03-03 09:19:36

http://www.courtrivals.com/forums/viewt … ?id=129625

well there goes my championship

Urbanstien · 2011-03-03 09:44:03

bheilman wrote:
http://www.courtrivals.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=129625

well there goes my championship

Yeah nothing like day 32 to "fix" a bug in the game. WOW I bet this hurts a lot of people

jrwafu · 2011-03-03 09:54:07

i hope everything will be fine next season in West

grudz_21 · 2011-03-03 17:17:34

jrwafu wrote:
i hope everything will be fine next season in West http://emoticons4u.com/fingers/fing34.gif

Seems to me like they need to simplify it a little bit...

Urbanstien · 2011-03-03 18:15:41

yeah like let us put our players in classic or jordon. Fold this shit league and still make our players free

grudz_21 · 2011-03-03 18:30:58

Urbanstien wrote:
yeah like let us put our players in classic or jordon. Fold this shit league and still make our players free

It should be that you only have to pay 1 pc for players in Jordan and classic leagues and you get them for maybe 3 seasons, and every 3 seasons you have to renew him. Remove west. But whatever is setup currently isn't working

Urbanstien · 2011-03-03 18:36:57

The thing is when most of us made a west guy it was 1 pc per player for life. why should it change because the leagu blows monkey nuts. Not our fault, but I bet you can guess who's it is.

connbound · 2011-03-03 22:09:07

Wow what an amazing difference, Ten Players played the same team 2 nights in a row, once with and once without the "strategy", what a find that was for you guys, while it lasted.

grudz_21 · 2011-03-03 22:11:23

If we made a tournament bracket on most hated courtrivals people the 1 seeds would be:
Kaz
TarheelsUnc
Right now its bunhole(for me)
And ACCFan haha tarheels made it twice

Court Rivals Forums

#1 2011-03-02 00:25:31

STRANGE ?

#2 2011-03-02 00:28:05

Re: STRANGE ?

#3 2011-03-02 00:29:32

Re: STRANGE ?

#4 2011-03-02 00:29:59

Re: STRANGE ?

#5 2011-03-02 00:37:47

Re: STRANGE ?

cokemachine wrote:

#6 2011-03-02 00:41:29

Re: STRANGE ?

Urbanstien wrote:

#7 2011-03-02 00:54:31

Re: STRANGE ?

CHICKEN wrote:

cokemachine wrote:

#8 2011-03-02 01:20:30

Re: STRANGE ?

#9 2011-03-02 01:31:06

Re: STRANGE ?

bheilman wrote:

#10 2011-03-02 02:02:01

Re: STRANGE ?

bheilman wrote:

#11 2011-03-02 07:12:09

Re: STRANGE ?

#12 2011-03-02 07:54:07

Re: STRANGE ?

Hubbalicious wrote:

#13 2011-03-02 13:22:51

Re: STRANGE ?

#14 2011-03-02 18:41:40

Re: STRANGE ?

#15 2011-03-02 20:52:44

Re: STRANGE ?

#16 2011-03-02 21:30:27

Re: STRANGE ?

connbound wrote:

#17 2011-03-03 09:19:36

Re: STRANGE ?

#18 2011-03-03 09:44:03

Re: STRANGE ?

bheilman wrote:

#19 2011-03-03 09:54:07

Re: STRANGE ?

#20 2011-03-03 17:17:34

Re: STRANGE ?

jrwafu wrote:

#21 2011-03-03 18:15:41

Re: STRANGE ?

#22 2011-03-03 18:30:58

Re: STRANGE ?

Urbanstien wrote:

#23 2011-03-03 18:36:57

Re: STRANGE ?

#24 2011-03-03 22:09:07

Re: STRANGE ?

#25 2011-03-03 22:11:23

Re: STRANGE ?

Board footer